The US Department of Justice (DoJ) is set to challenge Google’s highly profitable ad tech business in a landmark antitrust trial.
Starting on Monday, the case will focus on whether Alphabet, Google’s parent company, has been using its dominance to stifle competition in the digital ad market.
In 2023, Google generated over $200 billion (£152 billion) from ad placements, a key driver of its financial success.
While Alphabet argues that its market success comes from the effectiveness of its services, the US government contends that the company illegally maintains a monopoly that limits market competition.
Source: Statista
Google’s ad tech faces allegations of monopolistic practices
The lawsuit, filed by the Department of Justice and a coalition of states in 2023, argues that Google dominates the digital ad marketplace and has leveraged this position to limit innovation and competition.
The case, heard by US District Judge Leonie Brinkema, will determine if Alphabet has unlawfully used its market power to shut out rivals and maintain control over the digital advertising sector.
The DoJ’s focus is on Google’s extensive suite of ad tech tools, which prosecutors claim creates an unfair playing field for competitors.
Alphabet, however, counters these claims, arguing that it is just one of many players in the digital ad ecosystem.
According to the company, there are hundreds of competitors in the digital ad space, including major firms like Apple, Amazon, and TikTok, which have all shown significant growth in recent years.
Google maintains that competition is intensifying, not declining, as evidenced by the growing ad revenues of these firms.
Impact on Google’s business
The outcome of the trial could have far-reaching consequences for Google’s business model and the broader digital advertising landscape.
The DoJ’s case comes on the heels of a major decision last month in another antitrust case involving Google’s search business.
In that instance, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google had illegally maintained its monopoly in online search, and remedies are still being decided.
Legal experts believe that even if the DoJ wins this case, the remedies may not lead to a breakup of Alphabet.
Dan Ives, managing director at Wedbush Securities, noted that the penalties might instead involve significant changes to Google’s business practices rather than a full dismantling of the company.
The complexities of ad tech, which involves multiple interconnected systems for buying, selling, and placing ads online, make it difficult to argue for a straightforward solution.
Challenges for the US government
While the DoJ is armed with the recent legal victory in the search monopoly case, proving anticompetitive behaviour in the digital ad sector poses unique challenges.
Rebecca Haw Allensworth, an antitrust professor at Vanderbilt University Law School, pointed out that while consumers understand Google’s search product, advertising technology is far more intricate.
This complexity could hinder the government’s ability to present a compelling monopolisation argument.
The trial is also being closely watched by other global regulators. The UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) recently reported similar concerns about Google’s dominance in the ad tech market.
The CMA’s initial findings indicate that Google may have abused its market power to harm competition, potentially affecting thousands of UK publishers and advertisers.
Google has dismissed these claims, arguing that the CMA’s investigation is based on a flawed understanding of the sector.
The US and UK actions reflect a broader global trend where regulators are increasingly scrutinising Big Tech companies for potential abuses of market power.
As governments worldwide look more closely at how digital markets operate, other firms in the sector may also face heightened regulatory challenges.
Google’s case may serve as a precedent, influencing how digital advertising is regulated in other jurisdictions.
Google’s defence strategy and possible scenarios
Google’s defence in this case appears to be consistent with its approach in other antitrust trials—emphasising the competitive nature of the digital ad market and the effectiveness of its products.
Alphabet insists that its ad tools are popular because they work well, not because it forces companies to use them.
The outcome of this trial could shape the future landscape of digital advertising and how tech giants are allowed to operate within it.
As the trial unfolds, market participants and legal experts will be closely monitoring how Judge Brinkema navigates the complexities of ad tech and determines whether Google’s conduct crosses the line into monopolistic behaviour.
With stakes this high, the results could either pave the way for a more open digital advertising market or reinforce the status quo.
The post US takes aim at Google’s $200 billion ad tech business; Alphabet faces antitrust battle appeared first on Invezz
